On 09/27, Tyler Baicar wrote: > On 9/27/2017 6:05 AM, gengdongjiu wrote: > >Tyler, Stephen > > > >On 2017/9/27 3:23, Tyler Baicar wrote: > >>>Signed-off-by: Dongjiu Geng <gengdongjiu@xxxxxxxxxx> > >>Tested-by: Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> > >>Tested this functionality using SEA support. > >> > >>++Stephen, > >> > >>Something to be aware of, this patch will conflict with https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/9/14/663 > >>It may make sense to just remove the conditions for the NMI configs as part of this patch or in a series with this patch to avoid merge conflicts. > >In your patch, you only remove ACPI_APEI_SEA for the ARCH_HAVE_NMI_SAFE_CMPXCHG, do you need to remove it for the HAVE_NMI? > From the latest comments it sounds like Stephen was going to remove > it from both. > https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/9/15/350 Sent it now. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
