On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 01:20:35AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx> > > Push the system suspend/resume callbacks of intel-lpss to the late > suspend/early resume stages to allow child device callbacks to be > pushed to the late/early stages of suspend/resume too, so as to > make it possible to avoid resuming the children if they are runtime- > suspended during system suspend going forward. > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx> > Tested-by: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Tested-by: Johannes Stezenbach <js@xxxxxxxxx> > Tested-by: Rajat Jain <rajatja@xxxxxxxxxx> If this series shall go in via I2C, I'd need an ack from Lee for this one. Also, I'd assume this should go in for v4.14 already? > --- > > v3 -> v4: Added Tested-by tags. > > --- > drivers/mfd/intel-lpss.h | 7 +------ > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-) > > Index: linux-pm/drivers/mfd/intel-lpss.h > =================================================================== > --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/mfd/intel-lpss.h > +++ linux-pm/drivers/mfd/intel-lpss.h > @@ -38,12 +38,7 @@ int intel_lpss_resume(struct device *dev > #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP > #define INTEL_LPSS_SLEEP_PM_OPS \ > .prepare = intel_lpss_prepare, \ > - .suspend = intel_lpss_suspend, \ > - .resume = intel_lpss_resume, \ > - .freeze = intel_lpss_suspend, \ > - .thaw = intel_lpss_resume, \ > - .poweroff = intel_lpss_suspend, \ > - .restore = intel_lpss_resume, > + SET_LATE_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(intel_lpss_suspend, intel_lpss_resume) > #else > #define INTEL_LPSS_SLEEP_PM_OPS > #endif > >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
