Hi Pavel, On Fri, Sep 08, 2017 at 03:36:52PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > Document optional lens-focus and flash properties for the smiapp driver. > > > > Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/nokia,smia.txt | 2 ++ > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/nokia,smia.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/nokia,smia.txt > > index 855e1faf73e2..a052969365d9 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/nokia,smia.txt > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/nokia,smia.txt > > @@ -27,6 +27,8 @@ Optional properties > > - nokia,nvm-size: The size of the NVM, in bytes. If the size is not given, > > the NVM contents will not be read. > > - reset-gpios: XSHUTDOWN GPIO > > +- flash-leds: One or more phandles to refer to flash LEDs > > +- lens-focus: Phandle for lens focus > > Should we simply reference the generic documentation here? If it needs > changing, it will be easier changing single place. Good question. Ideally the properties at least would never change; we do have a common parser for the properties which is part of the patchset so in theory it would be possible to change the documentation in a backward-compatible way. I added these properties as well as all the other properties supported by the sensor driver are documented here. That has been the practice AFAIU, albeit omissions do happen occasionally. The issue I see with omitting the documentation here is that the user otherwise won't know whether a driver uses a given property or not: it shouldn't be necessary to read driver code to write DT source. -- Regards, Sakari Ailus e-mail: sakari.ailus@xxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
