On Thursday, September 7, 2017 9:39:03 AM CEST Lee Jones wrote: > On Thu, 07 Sep 2017, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > On Wednesday, September 6, 2017 12:52:09 PM CEST Lee Jones wrote: > > > > > In any case, I wouldn't mind it if you took the [3/3] from this series, because > > > > > if there are any conflicts with it, they will be trivial to resolve. And I > > > > > don't need an immutable branch with it or anything like that. > > > > > > > > No problem. > > > > > > Although you don't appear to have reviewed it? > > > > I have reviewed it, although I haven't sent a tag. > > > > Generally speaking, for drivers/acpi/pmic/ Reviewed-bys from Mika and Andy are > > sufficient (they likely are more familiar with the code in there than I am), > > I don't see them in MAINTAINERS. I thought it was Len and yourself. I do need help with code review at least in some areas, though. Some of this information is missing from MAINTAINERS, but I guess that can be addressed in this particular case. Mika, Andy, would it be OK to add you as reviewers for drivers/acpi/pmic/ to MAINTAINERS? Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
