On 8/30/2017 11:14 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 09:42:08AM -0600, Baicar, Tyler wrote:
I think with my two patches we will have the desired functionality:
GHES_SEV_CORRECTABLE -> AER_CORRECTABLE -> Print AER info, but do not call
do_recovery
GHES_SEV_RECOVERABLE -> AER_NONFATAL -> Print AER info and do_recovery
GHES_RECOVERABLE and CPER_SEC_RESET -> AER_FATAL -> Print AER info and
do_recover
Right, so I'd like to you create a separate function ghes_do_proc_aer()
or ghes_handle_aer() or so and carve out all the code inside #ifdef
CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_PCIEAER into it, add your two changes to the patch and
slap a big fat comment above the new function explaining *why* we're
doing what we're doing and how we're mapping all the severities to AER
severity in order to do recovery and/or only to print the error.
So that it is known and people can see in the future why we're doing
this and what the logic has been and what kind of policy we're chasing
and so on and so on...
Ok?
Thanks.
Yes, I can do that.
Thanks,
Tyler
--
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
