On 28/08/2017 23:17, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thursday, August 24, 2017 11:48:19 AM CEST Sudeep Holla wrote: >> >> On 23/08/17 22:18, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On x86 the fist idle state is a polling one, but the way it is set up is far >>> from straightforward and then it is avoided by governors in rather somewhat >>> convoluted fashion. >>> >>> Make this more clear by explicitly flagging that state as "polling" and >>> checking its flag where it needs to be avoided instead of using >>> arch-dependent numbering of idle states (patch [1/3]), move the >>> polling state code from driver.c to a separate C file (patch [2/3]) and >>> move the initialization of it from the core to the relevant cpuidle drivers - >>> ACPI and intel_idle (patch [3/3]). >>> >> >> Tested this on ARM64 platform(both DT and ACPI/LPI) and everything >> continues to work fine. >> Tested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx> > > Thanks Sudeep! > > I haven't seen any more comments on this which I'm taking as a green light for > it, so I'm going to queue it up for 4.14. Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx> -- <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook | <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter | <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
