+EDAC, Boris and Tony for RAS comments. Any comments from ACPI folks? Thanks, Yazen > -----Original Message----- > From: Ghannam, Yazen > Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2017 1:58 PM > To: linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; lenb@xxxxxxxxxx; > Ghannam, Yazen <Yazen.Ghannam@xxxxxxx> > Subject: [PATCH] ACPI, APEI, EINJ: Subtract any matching Register Region from > Trigger resources > > From: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@xxxxxxx> > > ACPI defines a number of instructions to use for triggering errors. However > we are currently removing the address resources from the trigger resources > for only the WRITE_REGISTER_VALUE instruction. This leads to a resource > conflict for any other valid instruction. > > Remove the WRITE_REGISTER_VALUE instruction check to fix the resource > conflict with other instructions. > > Fixes: b4e008dc53a3 ("ACPI, APEI, EINJ, Refine the fix of resource conflict") > Signed-off-by: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@xxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/acpi/apei/einj.c | 1 - > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/einj.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/einj.c > index ec50c32ea3da..e0f201ea161d 100644 > --- a/drivers/acpi/apei/einj.c > +++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/einj.c > @@ -281,7 +281,6 @@ static struct acpi_generic_address > *einj_get_trigger_parameter_region( > ((char *)trigger_tab + sizeof(struct acpi_einj_trigger)); > for (i = 0; i < trigger_tab->entry_count; i++) { > if (entry->action == ACPI_EINJ_TRIGGER_ERROR && > - entry->instruction == ACPI_EINJ_WRITE_REGISTER_VALUE && > entry->register_region.space_id == > ACPI_ADR_SPACE_SYSTEM_MEMORY && > (entry->register_region.address & param2) == (param1 & > param2)) > -- > 2.7.4 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html