On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 04:53:57PM -0700, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:
> + out_obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(lps0_device_handle, &lps0_dsm_guid,
> + 1, ACPI_LPS0_GET_DEVICE_CONSTRAINTS,
> + NULL);
> +
> + acpi_handle_debug(lps0_device_handle, "_DSM function 1 eval %s\n",
> + out_obj ? "successful" : "failed");
> +
> + if (!out_obj)
> + return;
> +
> + if (out_obj->type != ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE)
> + goto free_acpi_buffer;
Using acpi_evaluate_dsm_typed() would avoid having to check the type here.
> + for (i = 0; i < out_obj->package.count; i++) {
> + union acpi_object *package = &out_obj->package.elements[i];
> + struct lpi_device_info info;
> + int package_count = 0, j;
> +
> + if (!package)
> + continue;
> +
> + info.enabled = 0;
> + info.package = NULL;
> + info.name = NULL;
Using a declaration such as
struct lpi_device_info info = { };
would avoid having to zero the struct elements here.
Thanks,
Lukas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
