On Sat, 2017-08-05 at 07:12 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 08:39:35PM +0000, Kani, Toshimitsu wrote:
> > Well, we did talk a lot about your suggested name,
> > "acpi_blacklist", and I explained that it did not work since it'd
> > be used for both black and white-list. We've agreed on that.
> >
> > You then suggested it's "platform", not "OEM". Since this is an
> > ACPI structure defined in "acpi.h", its terminology generally
> > follows ACPI spec, which I did.
> >
> > I understand that you feel strongly against "OEM" (sorry about
> > that). How about "acpi_platform_list"? Does it work for you?
>
> Yes, I thought we agreed on all that.
Sounds good. Will change to "acpi_platform_list".
Thanks,
-Toshi
��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{�����ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f
