On Sat, Aug 05, 2017 at 02:56:43PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx> > > To make it clear that the symbol in question refers to > suspend-to-idle, rename it from PM_SUSPEND_FREEZE to > PM_SUSPEND_S2IDLE. > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/acpi/sleep.c | 2 - > drivers/regulator/of_regulator.c | 2 - > include/linux/suspend.h | 4 +-- > kernel/power/suspend.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------- > kernel/power/suspend_test.c | 4 +-- > 5 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) > > Index: linux-pm/include/linux/suspend.h > =================================================================== > --- linux-pm.orig/include/linux/suspend.h > +++ linux-pm/include/linux/suspend.h > @@ -33,10 +33,10 @@ static inline void pm_restore_console(vo > typedef int __bitwise suspend_state_t; > > #define PM_SUSPEND_ON ((__force suspend_state_t) 0) > -#define PM_SUSPEND_FREEZE ((__force suspend_state_t) 1) > +#define PM_SUSPEND_S2IDLE ((__force suspend_state_t) 1) > #define PM_SUSPEND_STANDBY ((__force suspend_state_t) 2) > #define PM_SUSPEND_MEM ((__force suspend_state_t) 3) I feel something like PM_SUSPEND_IDLE is more consistent with the existing PM_SUSPEND_MEM. Also the proposed PM_SUSPEND_S2IDLE has 'SUSPEND' in it twice, so at the very least it should be PM_SUSPEND_2IDLE :-) > -#define PM_SUSPEND_MIN PM_SUSPEND_FREEZE > +#define PM_SUSPEND_MIN PM_SUSPEND_S2IDLE > #define PM_SUSPEND_MAX ((__force suspend_state_t) 4) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
