On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 9:16 AM, Liwei Song <liwei.song@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 07/21/2017 05:56 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 12:41 PM, Song liwei <liwei.song@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> /* Fixup common BIOS bug */
>> if (bit_offset == 0) {
>> if (bit_width == 16 && (*paddr & 0x01) == 0 && *access_bit_width < 16)
>> *access_bit_width = 16;
>> else if (bit_width == 32 && (*paddr & 0x03) == 0 &&
>> *access_bit_width < 32)
>> *access_bit_width = 32;
>> else if (bit_width == 64 && (*paddr & 0x07) == 0 &&
>> *access_bit_width < 64)
>> *access_bit_width = 64;
>> }
> Thanks for your suggestion, what about the condition like the following?
> The main bug in bios is bit_width is not comfortable with access_bit_width
> So check it first.
>
> if (*access_bit_width < bit_width && bit_offset == 0) {
> if ((bit_width == 16 && (*paddr & 0x01) == 0) ||
> (bit_width == 32 && (*paddr & 0x03) == 0) ||
> (bit_width == 64 && (*paddr & 0x07) == 0))
> *access_bit_width = bit_width;
> }
Either works to me.
P.S. Less explicit case is to use bit operations to check those, i.e.
is_power_of_2(), fls().
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
