Em Mon, 24 Jul 2017 15:56:27 +0000 "Kani, Toshimitsu" <toshi.kani@xxxxxxx> escreveu: > On Mon, 2017-07-24 at 17:37 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 03:25:34PM +0000, Kani, Toshimitsu wrote: > : > > > > > We've been providing this model for many years now. > > > > Dude, relax, I'm only trying to point out to you that there are > > customers who want to see *every* error and thus track how their > > hardware behaves. And that for those customers it is probably worth > > considering exposing that info and providing a switch to disable that > > dumbing of the RAS functionality in the BIOS so that people can > > decide for themselves. That's all. > > Yes, Mauro has already pointed this out. As I replied to him, we do > have a separate series of platforms that do not have built-in RAS, and > report all errors. Such customers can simply choose them. They do not > need to pay for built-in RAS. That's probably too late for me as I received a new HP machine we bought just last week, but for the next time I would need to get a new hardware, what would be the non-RAS equivalent to a ML 350 G9 tower-mounted machine with two Xeon v4 CPUs and iLO? Regards, Mauro > > The model w/ built-in RAS provides warranty & full support. As I said, > it's a different model. > > Thanks, > -Toshi Thanks, Mauro -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
