On Thursday, July 20, 2017 05:33:43 PM Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Thu, 2017-07-20 at 16:27 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 4:03 PM, Lukas Wunner <lukas@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 12:03:31AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > On Friday, July 14, 2017 12:36:19 AM Lukas Wunner wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I guess I could introduce a new <linux/apple.h> but I hate the > > > insane > > > proliferation of additional files in include/linux/. > > > > There is include/linux/platform_data/x86/ so maybe put it in there? > > Just suggested the same :-) > > > > I could merge the contents of apple_bl.h and apple-gmux.h into that > > > new header to > > > reduce the number of files a bit. > > > > > > Struggling to find a solution that's nice and clean. Any ideas? > > > > I guess you still want it to work if someone configures the kernel > > without CONFIG_ACPI, although that's slightly debatable, so the > > variable should be defined somewhere in the arch code I suppose. > > > > I also guess you could add something like arch/x86/platform/apple/ and > > put the checks and the variable in there (in which case I'd call it > > x86_apple_machine or similar). > > I'm not sure if we can use drivers/platform/x86 for this, either agreed > way is fine to me. No, because of the ACPI involvement. That needs to go under arch/ IMO. Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
