Hi, On 10 July 2017 at 17:09, Arthur Marsh <arthur.marsh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Luca Tettamanti wrote on 10/07/17 19:35: >> >> Hi, >> >> On 9 July 2017 at 05:35, Arthur Marsh <arthur.marsh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >>> >>> On post 4.12.0 kernels >> >> >> So 4.11.9 works but 4.12 doesn't, correct? > > > I tried the latest stock Debian 4.11, which is 4.11.6-1, which didn't have > the ACPI exceptions. > > >> >>> on an ASUS M3A7A Pro motherboard, I've been getting >>> messages about the asus_atk0110 module: >>> >>> am64:/usr/src/linux# dmesg|grep -i atk >>> [ 12.517304] ATK0110 ATK0110:00: hwmon_device_register() is deprecated. >>> Please convert the driver to use hwmon_device_register_with_info(). >>> [ 54.749748] ATK0110 ATK0110:00: GITM[0x6020011] ACPI exception: >>> AE_BAD_PARAMETER >>> [ 54.752680] ATK0110 ATK0110:00: GITM[0x6020061] ACPI exception: >>> AE_BAD_PARAMETER >>> [ 54.755502] ATK0110 ATK0110:00: GITM[0x6020062] ACPI exception: >>> AE_BAD_PARAMETER >>> [ 54.758310] ATK0110 ATK0110:00: GITM[0x6020063] ACPI exception: >>> AE_BAD_PARAMETER >>> [ 54.758390] ATK0110 ATK0110:00: GITM[0x6040013] ACPI exception: >>> AE_BAD_PARAMETER >>> [ 54.758466] ATK0110 ATK0110:00: GITM[0x6040073] ACPI exception: >>> AE_BAD_PARAMETER >>> [ 54.758527] ATK0110 ATK0110:00: GITM[0x60400c3] ACPI exception: >>> AE_BAD_PARAMETER >>> [ 54.758579] ATK0110 ATK0110:00: GITM[0x6030012] ACPI exception: >>> AE_BAD_PARAMETER >>> [ 54.758631] ATK0110 ATK0110:00: GITM[0x6030074] ACPI exception: >>> AE_BAD_PARAMETER >>> >>> This might be related to hard CPU lock-ups that I see later on, so for >>> now >>> I've unloaded the asus_atk0110 module to see if that prevents later >>> lock-ups. >>> >>> I can supply more configuration/log information and run tests if anyone >>> want >>> them. >> >> >> Can you please supply the full dmesg when booting with loglevel=7? >> Also please attach a copy of the DSDT table >> (/sys/firmware/acpi/tables/DSDT). So I don't see anything strange in the DSDT and the fact that older kernels work fine makes me think that something changed in acpica. Rafael, you merged acpica post v4.12 (the last working kernel): can you see anything that could have changed the way parameter validation works? L. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
