On Tue, 2017-07-18 at 10:08 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 08:00:07AM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > > And I think we should try this first: have the firmware disable > > detection methods so that the platform drivers don't load. > > Btw, in looking at this more, what about the firmware-first thing? > > I.e., the firmware-first detection with apei_osc_setup() at the end > of ghes_init(). > > Can we make ghes_edac loading dependent on that? I mean, that was > *the* predicate for exactly that - to have the firmware look at the > errors first. No need for platform whitelisting and so on. I agree that 'osc_sb_apei_support_acked' should be checked when enabling ghes_edac. I do not know the details of existing issues, but it sounds unlikely that this will address all of them since bugs can be everywhere. For instance, ghes_edac relies on DMI/SMBIOS info, unlike other EDAC drivers, which can be buggy regardless of this _OSC info. > I'd still decouple ghes_edac loading from ghes_probe() even though > loading the platform driver should've been done *after* the > firmware-first detection regardless. > > So what we could do is make ghes_edac a normal module and have the > relevant x86 EDAC modules query FF mode and if enabled, fail loading. I agree that making ghes_edac as a normal module is a good thing, but I do not think it's going to solve this issue. Thanks, -Toshi ��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{�����ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f