Re: [PATCH] ACPI / Processor: add sysfs support for low power idle

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Monday, July 10, 2017 04:47:00 PM Prakash, Prashanth wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
> 
> On 6/27/2017 5:59 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 9:19 PM, Prashanth Prakash
> > <pprakash@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> Add support to expose idle statistics maintained by platform to
> >> userspace via sysfs in addition to other data of interest from
> >> each LPI(Low Power Idle) state.
> >>
> >> LPI described in section 8.4.4 of ACPI spec 6.1 provides different
> >> methods to obtain idle statistics maintained by the platform. These
> >> show a granular view of how each of the LPI state is being used at
> >> different level of hierarchy. sysfs data is exposed at each level in
> >> the hierarchy by creating a directory named 'lpi' at each level and
> >> the LPI state information is presented under it. Below is the
> >> representation of LPI information at one such level in the hierarchy
> >>
> >> .../ACPI00XX: XX/lpi
> >>         |-> state0
> >>         |       |-> desc
> >>         |       |-> time
> >>         |       |-> usage
> >>         |       |-> latency
> >>         |       |-> min_residency
> >>         |
> >>         <<more states>>
> >>
> >> ACPI00XX can be ACPI0007(processor) or ACPI0010(processor container)
> >>
> >> stateX contains information related to a specific LPI state defined
> >> in the LPI ACPI tables.
> > That needs to be documented under Documentation/ABI/.
> Sure, I will create a patch updating the ABI documentation.

No, please update the documentation in this patch.

> >> diff --git a/include/acpi/processor.h b/include/acpi/processor.h
> >> index c1ba00f..b99b84b 100644
> >> --- a/include/acpi/processor.h
> >> +++ b/include/acpi/processor.h
> >> @@ -79,6 +79,19 @@ struct acpi_lpi_state {
> >>         u8 index;
> >>         u8 entry_method;
> >>         char desc[ACPI_CX_DESC_LEN];
> >> +       struct acpi_generic_address res_cntr;
> >> +       struct acpi_generic_address usage_cntr;
> > Is there any reason why these two cannot be of type struct acpi_power_register?
> acpi_read() API required reference to acpi_generic_address (our only use case is to read the
> register), so keeping this data in acpi_generic_address makes the code little simpler.

OK, fair enough.

Thanks,
Rafael

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux