On Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 12:53:34PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: >Some of include directives in include/linux/gpio/driver.h are >unneeded because the header does not need to know the content of >struct device, irq_chip, etc. Just declare they are structures. > >On the other hand, <linux/irqhandler.h> and <linux/spinlock_types.h> >turned out to be necessary for irq_flow_handler_t and spinlock_t, >respectively. > >Each driver should include what it needs without relying on what is >implicitly included from <linux/gpio/driver.h>. This will cut down >unnecessary header parsing. > >Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >--- > > drivers/gpio/gpio-104-dio-48e.c | 1 + > drivers/gpio/gpio-104-idi-48.c | 1 + > drivers/gpio/gpio-104-idio-16.c | 1 + > drivers/gpio/gpio-pci-idio-16.c | 2 ++ > drivers/gpio/gpio-ws16c48.c | 1 + The changes to the above drivers look fine to me: Acked-by: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@xxxxxxxxx> However, this patch as a whole does too many things; I'd like to see it split-up logically similar to how Andy Shevchenko suggested in his reply. That should allow ACKs by respective driver maintainers to be accounted more properly. William Breathitt Gray -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
