2017-07-04 19:06 GMT+09:00 Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > On Tue, 2017-07-04 at 12:53 +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: >> Some of include directives in include/linux/gpio/driver.h are >> unneeded because the header does not need to know the content of >> struct device, irq_chip, etc. Just declare they are structures. >> >> On the other hand, <linux/irqhandler.h> and <linux/spinlock_types.h> >> turned out to be necessary for irq_flow_handler_t and spinlock_t, >> respectively. >> >> Each driver should include what it needs without relying on what is >> implicitly included from <linux/gpio/driver.h>. This will cut down >> unnecessary header parsing. > > If Linus is okay with the following proposal I would rather go with it, > i.e. logical split the series to > > 1. Fix IRQ related headers inclusion > 2. Fix pinconf-generic.h inclusion > 3. Fix OF headers inclusion (btw, of_gpio.h is not enough there?) Maybe 4. Fix (platform_)device inclusion But, I do not see much sense to touch headers multiple times. -- Best Regards Masahiro Yamada -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
