On Thursday, June 22, 2017 04:38:49 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thursday, June 22, 2017 10:39:37 AM Mika Westerberg wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 11:33:52PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > -#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP > > > -/** > > > - * acpi_pm_device_sleep_wake - Enable or disable device to wake up the system. > > > - * @dev: Device to enable/desible to wake up the system from sleep states. > > > - * @enable: Whether to enable or disable @dev to wake up the system. > > > - */ > > > -int acpi_pm_device_sleep_wake(struct device *dev, bool enable) > > > +int acpi_pm_device_wakeup(struct device *dev, bool enable) > > > > Can we call it acpi_pm_device_enable_wakeup() and then provide > > corresponding acpi_pm_device_disable_wakeup()? I find those easier to > > understand than acpi_pm_device_wakeup() that sounds like the device > > should be woken up now. > > OK, fair enough. I'll change it this way. Well, sorry, I'd rather not to, or we'll have to add a wrapper around them in pci-acpi.c. :-) I can rename it to acpi_pm_device_set_wakeup(), though. Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
