On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 07:01:38PM +0000, Gabriele Paoloni wrote:
> I am not very familiar with Linux MFD however the main issue here is that
> 1) for IPMI we want to re-use the standard IPMI driver without touching it:
> see
>
> static const struct acpi_device_id acpi_ipmi_match[] = {
> { "IPI0001", 0 },
> { },
> };
>
> in "drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c" (and in general any standard driver
> of an LPC child)
>
> 2) We need a way to guarantee that all LPC children are not enumerated
> by acpi_default_enumeration() (so for example if an ipmi node is an LPC#
> child it should not be enumerated, otherwise it should be)
> Currently acpi_default_enumeration() skips spi/i2c slaves by checking:
> 1) if the acpi resource type is a serial bus
> 2) if the type of serial bus descriptor is I2C or SPI
>
> For LPC we cannot leverage on any ACPI property to "recognize" that our
> devices are LPC children; hence before I proposed for acpi_default_enumeration()
> to skip devices that have already been enumerated (by calling
> acpi_device_enumerated() ).
>
> So in the current scenario, how do you think that MFD can help?
If you look at Documentation/acpi/enumeration.txt there is a chapter
"MFD devices". I think it pretty much maches what you have here. An LPC
device (MFD device) and bunch of child devices. The driver for your LPC
device can specify _HID for each child device. Those are then mached by
the MFD ACPI code to the corresponding ACPI nodes from which platform
devices are created including "IPI0001".
It causes acpi_default_enumeration() to be called but it should be fine
as we are dealing with platform device anyway.
Once the platform device is created your ipmi driver will be probed by
the driver core.
Does that make sense?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
