2017-06-12 22:35 GMT+02:00 Jérôme de Bretagne <jerome.debretagne@xxxxxxxxx>: >> I don't see HEBC in the ASL for the 7275. It would be good to provide >> this information across both of the BIOS versions (working and non-working). >> >> As well as what >> status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, "BTNC", NULL, &button_cap); >> evaluates as on both too. > > I'll provide both BTNC and HEBC log results to compare, with both BIOS > versions, a bit later today. Here are both requested logs, with BIOS 1.1.31 first: * right after status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, "HEBC", NULL, &event_cap); [ 4.167874] intel-hid INT33D5:00: intel_hid_probe: event_cap = 0xffff9bfe71bdc410 [ 4.167875] intel-hid INT33D5:00: intel_hid_probe: status = 5 * right after status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, "BTNC", NULL, &button_cap); => No log output for that one And with BIOS 1.1.20 then: * right after status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, "HEBC", NULL, &event_cap); [ 4.172543] intel-hid INT33D5:00: intel_hid_probe: event_cap = 0xffff8d1f70950810 [ 4.172545] intel-hid INT33D5:00: intel_hid_probe: status = 5 * right after status = acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, "BTNC", NULL, &button_cap); => No log output for that one Status = 5 confirms the assumption that HEBC is not found in both cases. I guess the absence of logs for BTNC is more surprising, isn't it? Jérome -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
