Hi Lee,
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] mfd: Add new mfd device TPS68470
>
> On Fri, 09 Jun 2017, Mani, Rajmohan wrote:
>
> > Hi Andy,
> >
> > > On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 03:59:49PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 2:55 PM, Rajmohan Mani
> > > <rajmohan.mani@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > The TPS68470 device is an advanced power management unit that
> > > > > powers a Compact Camera Module (CCM), generates clocks for image
> > > > > sensors, drives a dual LED for Flash and incorporates two LED
> > > > > drivers for general purpose indicators.
> > > > >
> > > > > This patch adds support for TPS68470 mfd device.
> > > >
> > > > I dunno why you decide to send this out now, see my comments below.
> > > >
> > > > > +static int tps68470_chip_init(struct tps68470 *tps) {
> > > > > + unsigned int version;
> > > > > + int ret;
> > > >
> > > > > + /* FIXME: configure these dynamically */
> > > >
> > > > So, what prevents you to fix this?
> > >
> > > Nothing I suppose. They're however not needed right now and can be
> > > implemented later on if they're ever needed.
> > >
> >
> > Ack
>
> What does this mean? Is the plan to fix it or not? I don't want FIXMEs in the
> code that a) can be fixed right away or b) might never be fixed.
>
I meant that this can be implemented later on, if there's a need.
I will look into this and see how this can be fixed.
Thanks
Raj
��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{�����ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f
