Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] acpi/iort: numa: Add numa node mapping for smmuv3 devices

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 10:08 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi
<lorenzo.pieralisi@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 04:17:45PM +0530, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote:
>> Add code to parse proximity domain in SMMUv3 IORT table to
>> set numa node mapping for smmuv3 devices.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ganapatrao Kulkarni <ganapatrao.kulkarni@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c b/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
>> index bba2b59..b4f328f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
>> @@ -882,6 +882,23 @@ static bool __init arm_smmu_v3_is_coherent(struct acpi_iort_node *node)
>>       return smmu->flags & ACPI_IORT_SMMU_V3_COHACC_OVERRIDE;
>>  }
>>
>> +/*
>> + * set numa proximity domain for smmv3 device
>> + */
>> +static void  __init iort_set_proximity(struct acpi_iort_node *node,
>> +             struct device *dev)
>> +{
>> +     struct acpi_iort_smmu_v3 *smmu;
>> +
>> +     smmu = (struct acpi_iort_smmu_v3 *)node->node_data;
>> +     if (smmu->flags & ACPI_IORT_SMMU_V3_PXM_VALID) {
>> +             set_dev_node(dev, acpi_map_pxm_to_node(smmu->pxm));
>> +             pr_info("SMMUV3[%llx] Mapped to Proximity domain %d\n",
>> +                     smmu->base_address,
>> +                     smmu->pxm);
>> +     }
>> +}
>> +
>>  static int __init arm_smmu_count_resources(struct acpi_iort_node *node)
>>  {
>>       struct acpi_iort_smmu *smmu;
>> @@ -1002,6 +1019,9 @@ static int __init iort_add_smmu_platform_device(struct acpi_iort_node *node)
>>       if (!pdev)
>>               return -ENOMEM;
>>
>> +     if (node->type == ACPI_IORT_NODE_SMMU_V3)
>> +             iort_set_proximity(node, &pdev->dev);
>
> Nit: while at it you may add an ops hook to set the proximity
> (NULL for SMMU v2) and call it if present, it is just to make
> the code adding devices more uniform.

thanks, will do

>
> Who is queueing these patches ? I am asking to make sure we sort
> the ACPICA dependency (there are other IORT/ACPICA patches to consider
> too).
>
> Thanks,
> Lorenzo
>
>>       count = ops->iommu_count_resources(node);
>>
>>       r = kcalloc(count, sizeof(*r), GFP_KERNEL);
>> --
>> 1.8.1.4
>>

thanks
Ganapat
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux