On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 11:10 PM, Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 04:40:13PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 3:15 PM, Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxx> wrote: >> > On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 05:23:56PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >> >> Follow the pattern, please, I suppose >> >> ti_pmic_tps68470.c >> >> Would it work for you? > > This is still a different driver from the tps68470 driver which is an MFD > driver. For clarity, I'd keep pmic as part of the name (and I'd use > tps68470_pmic_ prefix for internal symbols, too). > > As PMICs are typically linked to the kernel (vs. being modules), there's no > issue with the module name. I would suppose few if any PMICs will be > compiled as modules in general. > > It's not a big deal though. I'm fine either way. Okay, let's agree on tps68470_pmic for internal prefix and for file name? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
