On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 03:14:46PM +0000, Moore, Robert wrote: > I believe that the rationale for this is that at that point in the code, it is *guaranteed* that there is at least one operand; therefore the -1 would always be valid. > > In the end, we just deleted that call to > acpi_db_display_argument_object. > > I don't know if this change has made it into Linux yet. > The latest rc actually produces the UBSAN splat in my previous message. So I suppose, I have some buggy hardware/firmware. Thanks, Seraph -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
