On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 3:07 PM, Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxx> wrote:
>> +static int ti_tps68470_pmic_get_power(struct regmap *regmap, int reg,
>> + int bitmask, u64 *value)
>> +{
>> + int data;
>
> Shouldn't you use unsigned int here? Same in the functions below.
+1, regmap_read() returns unsigned int.
>> +static acpi_status ti_pmic_common_handler(u32 function,
> + acpi_physical_address address,
> + u32 bits, u64 *value,
> + void *handler_context,
> handler_context is unused.
>> + int, int, u64 *),
>> + int (*update)(struct regmap *,
>> + int, int, u64),
>> + struct ti_pmic_table *table,
>> + int table_size)
I would even split this to have separate update() and get() paths
instead of having such a monster of parameters.
>> +static acpi_status ti_pmic_clk_freq_handler(u32 function,
>> + acpi_physical_address address,
>> + u32 bits, u64 *value,
>> + void *handler_context,
>> + void *region_context)
>> +{
>> + return ti_pmic_common_handler(function, address, bits, value,
>> + handler_context, region_context,
>> + ti_tps68470_pmic_get_clk_freq,
>> + ti_tps68470_regmap_update_bits,
>> + (struct ti_pmic_table *) &clk_freq_table,
>
> You shouldn't use an explicit cast here. Instead make the function argument
> const as well and you're fine.
+1.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
