Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] device property: Move FW type specific functionality to FW specific files

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 11:53:19AM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> +static int acpi_fwnode_property_read_int_array(

Yuck!

> +	struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, const char *propname,
> +	unsigned int elem_size, void *val, size_t nval)

Can you please write it like:

static int acpi_fwnode_property_read_int_array(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
	const char *propname, unsigned int elem_size, void *val, size_t nval)

or even

static int acpi_fwnode_property_read_int_array(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
					       const char *propname,
					       unsigned int elem_size,
					       void *val, size_t nval)

Ditto to all similar constructs in this whole series.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux