Hi Bjorn > -----Original Message----- > From: Bjorn Helgaas [mailto:helgaas@xxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: 26 May 2017 22:20 > To: Gabriele Paoloni > Cc: catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx; will.deacon@xxxxxxx; robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; > frowand.list@xxxxxxxxx; bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx; rafael@xxxxxxxxxx; > arnd@xxxxxxxx; linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > lorenzo.pieralisi@xxxxxxx; mark.rutland@xxxxxxx; minyard@xxxxxxx; > benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; John Garry; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > xuwei (O); Linuxarm; linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; zhichang.yuan; linux- > pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; olof@xxxxxxxxx; brian.starkey@xxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 2/7] PCI: Apply the new generic I/O management > on PCI IO hosts > > On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 12:37:23PM +0100, Gabriele Paoloni wrote: > > From: "zhichang.yuan" <yuanzhichang@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > After introducing the new generic I/O space management(LOGIC_IO), the > > original PCI MMIO relevant helpers need to be updated based on the > new > > interfaces defined in LOGIC_IO. > > This patch adapts the corresponding code to match the changes > introduced > > by LOGIC_IO. > > > > Signed-off-by: zhichang.yuan <yuanzhichang@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Gabriele Paoloni <gabriele.paoloni@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> #earlier draft > > Not sure how you plan to merge this, but here's my ack: > > Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx> Many thanks for your Ack :) Maybe Arnd can take the whole patchset (or just the lib framework + DT part leaving the ACPI part to Lorenzo)....? > > If you split this as suggested below, add my ack to all three patches. Sure I will > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c > > index b01bd5b..c9fe12b 100644 > > --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c > > +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c > >... > > > -int __weak pci_register_io_range(phys_addr_t addr, resource_size_t > size) > > +int pci_register_io_range(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, phys_addr_t > addr, > > + resource_size_t size) > > It's trivial and nit-picky, but I would do the __weak removal in its > own patch. It's obviously fine because there's only one > implementation, but it's unrelated to the main point of this patch. Agreed > > I would split the signature change (fwnode addition) to a separate > patch, too, just to make the actual change more obvious, especially > since that's the only part that crosses subsystems (ACPI, PCI, OF). Agreed too > > > { > > - int err = 0; > > - > > + int ret = 0; > > #ifdef PCI_IOBASE > > - struct io_range *range; > > - resource_size_t allocated_size = 0; > > - > > - /* check if the range hasn't been previously recorded */ > > - spin_lock(&io_range_lock); > > - list_for_each_entry(range, &io_range_list, list) { > > - if (addr >= range->start && addr + size <= range->start + > size) { > > - /* range already registered, bail out */ > > - goto end_register; > > - } > > - allocated_size += range->size; > > - } > > - > > - /* range not registed yet, check for available space */ > > - if (allocated_size + size - 1 > IO_SPACE_LIMIT) { > > - /* if it's too big check if 64K space can be reserved */ > > - if (allocated_size + SZ_64K - 1 > IO_SPACE_LIMIT) { > > - err = -E2BIG; > > - goto end_register; > > - } > > - > > - size = SZ_64K; > > - pr_warn("Requested IO range too big, new size set to > 64K\n"); > > - } > > + struct logic_pio_hwaddr *range; > > > > - /* add the range to the list */ > > - range = kzalloc(sizeof(*range), GFP_ATOMIC); > > - if (!range) { > > - err = -ENOMEM; > > - goto end_register; > > - } > > + if (!size || addr + size < addr) > > + return -EINVAL; > > > > - range->start = addr; > > + range = kzalloc(sizeof(*range), GFP_KERNEL); > > + if (!range) > > + return -ENOMEM; > > Add a blank line here. Yep I will Cheers Gab > > > + range->fwnode = fwnode; > > range->size = size; > > + range->hw_start = addr; > > + range->flags = PIO_CPU_MMIO; > > > > - list_add_tail(&range->list, &io_range_list); > > - > > -end_register: > > - spin_unlock(&io_range_lock); > > + ret = logic_pio_register_range(range); > > + if (ret) > > + kfree(range); > > #endif > > > > - return err; > > + return ret; > > } -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
