The IOMMU probe deferral IORT rework had to add code in iort_iommu_configure() and iort_iommu_xlate() that requires the IOMMU_API to be selected in order to compile and work. Stub out the pieces of code that depend on CONFIG_IOMMU_API to be selected to prevent compilation failures such as: drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c: In function 'iort_iommu_xlate': drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c:647:22: error: 'struct iommu_fwspec' has no member named 'ops' by wrapping the code in static inline functions that provide a NOP implementation when CONFIG_IOMMU_API is not selected. Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@xxxxxxx> Reported-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx> Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@xxxxxxx> Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Sricharan R <sricharan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- Joerg, all, as reported by Arnd: https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/4/27/303 we have this issue in -next and I managed to write this patch in a way that applies to Joerg's tree - branch: arm/core and does not conflict with ACPI IORT patches queued via arm64 tree. I know it is late and it is not a major breakage, so either Joerg applies this patch to his arm/core branch or I can send a fix for -rc1 when both the IOMMU and arm64 trees are merged, please let me know how you prefer handling it, it is a bit rushed owing to where we are in the cycle. Thanks ! Lorenzo drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c b/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c index e7b1940..a629e83 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c @@ -536,6 +536,33 @@ static inline bool iort_iommu_driver_enabled(u8 type) } } +#ifdef CONFIG_IOMMU_API +static inline +const struct iommu_ops *iort_fwspec_iommu_ops(struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec) +{ + return (fwspec && fwspec->ops) ? fwspec->ops : NULL; +} + +static inline +int iort_add_device_replay(const struct iommu_ops *ops, struct device *dev) +{ + int err = 0; + + if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(ops) && ops->add_device && dev->bus && + !dev->iommu_group) + err = ops->add_device(dev); + + return err; +} +#else +static inline +const struct iommu_ops *iort_fwspec_iommu_ops(struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec) +{ return NULL; } +static inline +int iort_add_device_replay(const struct iommu_ops *ops, struct device *dev) +{ return 0; } +#endif + static const struct iommu_ops *iort_iommu_xlate(struct device *dev, struct acpi_iort_node *node, u32 streamid) @@ -543,14 +570,14 @@ static const struct iommu_ops *iort_iommu_xlate(struct device *dev, const struct iommu_ops *ops = NULL; int ret = -ENODEV; struct fwnode_handle *iort_fwnode; - struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev->iommu_fwspec; /* * If we already translated the fwspec there * is nothing left to do, return the iommu_ops. */ - if (fwspec && fwspec->ops) - return fwspec->ops; + ops = iort_fwspec_iommu_ops(dev->iommu_fwspec); + if (ops) + return ops; if (node) { iort_fwnode = iort_get_fwnode(node); @@ -611,6 +638,7 @@ const struct iommu_ops *iort_iommu_configure(struct device *dev) struct acpi_iort_node *node, *parent; const struct iommu_ops *ops = NULL; u32 streamid = 0; + int err; if (dev_is_pci(dev)) { struct pci_bus *bus = to_pci_dev(dev)->bus; @@ -654,13 +682,9 @@ const struct iommu_ops *iort_iommu_configure(struct device *dev) * If we have reason to believe the IOMMU driver missed the initial * add_device callback for dev, replay it to get things in order. */ - if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(ops) && ops->add_device && - dev->bus && !dev->iommu_group) { - int err = ops->add_device(dev); - - if (err) - ops = ERR_PTR(err); - } + err = iort_add_device_replay(ops, dev); + if (err) + ops = ERR_PTR(err); return ops; } -- 2.10.0 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
