On 04/21, Luck, Tony wrote:
> >> > + if (!(mce->status & 0xef80) == BIT(7))
> >>
> >> Can we get a define for this, or a comment explaining all the magic
> >> that's happening on that one line?
> >
> > Yes - also like lkp pointed out, the check isn't correct at all. Let me
> > figure out what really needs to be done, and I will resend with a better
> > comment.
>
> Needs extra parentheses to make it right. Vishal, sorry I led you astray.
>
> if (!((mce->status & 0xef80) == BIT(7)))
Is this still right though? Anything AND'ed with 0xef80 will never equal
BIT(7) which is simply 01000000 binary (the lowest byte of the left hand
side is '0')
>
> The magic is shown in table 15-9 of the Intel Software Developers Manual
> (but perhaps not well explained there).
>
> mce->status in the above code is a value plucked from a machine check
> bank status register. See figure 15-6 in the SDM. The important bits for this
> are {15:0} which are the "MCA Error code". Table 15-9 shows how these
> are grouped into types, where the type is defined by the most significant '1'
> bit in the field (excluding bit 12 which is the Correction Report Filtering bit,
> see section 15.9.2.1).
>
> So if BIT(3) is the most significant bit, the this is a "Generic Cache Hierarchy"
> error, BIT(4) denotes a TLB error, BIT(7) a Memory error, and so on.
>
> Maybe we should have defines in mce.h for them? It gets a bit more complicated
> as all the above only applies to Intel branded X86 CPUs ... on AMD different
> decoding rules apply.
>
> -Tony
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
