Hi,
On 21-04-17 10:17, Takashi Iwai wrote:
On Fri, 21 Apr 2017 09:41:57 +0200,
Hans de Goede wrote:
Some peripherals on Baytrail and Cherrytrail platforms signal PME to the
PMC to wakeup the system. When this happens software needs to clear the
PME_B0_STS bit in the GPE0a_STS register to avoid an IRQ storm on IRQ 9.
This is modelled in ACPI through the INT0002 ACPI device.
This commit adds a driver which will bind to that device, call the
ACPI event handler for the wakeup and clear the interrupt source
avoiding the irq storm.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
This patch requires your previous "always present" patchset, right?
On boards where the _STA for INT0002 returns 0, that patchset
is needed for the driver to bind to the device, so yes it has
a functional requirement on some (most it seems) board, but
only at run-time, it can be merged independently.
Some nitpicking:
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel_int0002.c
...
+struct int0002_data {
+ struct spinlock lock;
+ struct device *dev;
+ const struct x86_cpu_id *cpu_id;
+ acpi_handle handle;
+ char ev_name[5];
Are 5 bytes enough? I see the code below:
+ snprintf(data->ev_name, sizeof(data->ev_name), "_%c%02X",
+ res->data.gpio.triggering ? 'E' : 'L',
+ res->data.gpio.pin_table[0]);
So it counts 6 including NUL.
The name is e.g. _E02 or _L02 so 5 bytes including the NUL is enough :)
+static int int0002_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ struct acpi_buffer buf = { ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER, NULL };
+ struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+ struct int0002_data *data;
+ struct acpi_resource *res;
+ acpi_status status;
+ acpi_handle hdl;
+ int irq, ret;
+
+ data = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*data), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!data) {
+ dev_err(dev, "can't allocate memory for int0002\n");
The error message is mostly superfluous.
Agreed, will fix for v2.
+static int int0002_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int int0002_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static const struct dev_pm_ops int0002_pm_ops = {
+ .runtime_suspend = int0002_runtime_suspend,
+ .runtime_resume = int0002_runtime_resume,
+};
Do we need these runtime PM? If not, we can remove the header
inclusion, too.
We enable runtime pm for this device, at which point these
are mandatory.
Other than that, I confirmed to work on my ASUS E200H.
Tested-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx>
Regards,
Hans
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
