On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 01:19:50AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx> > > The current code in acpi_bus_attach() is inconsistent with respect > to device objects with ACPI drivers bound to them, as it allows > ACPI drivers to bind to device objects with existing "physical" > device companions, but it doesn't allow "physical" device objects > to be created for ACPI device objects with ACPI drivers bound to > them. Thus, in some cases, the outcome depends on the ordering > of events which is confusing at best. > > For this reason, modify acpi_bus_attach() to call > acpi_default_enumeration() for device objects with the > pnp.type.platform_id flag set regardless of whether or not > any ACPI drivers are bound to them. > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx> I did my best to review the context of codes in this patchset. Reviewed-by: Joey Lee <jlee@xxxxxxxx> Thanka a lot! Joey Lee > --- > drivers/acpi/scan.c | 6 +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/scan.c > =================================================================== > --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/scan.c > +++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/scan.c > @@ -1866,10 +1866,10 @@ static void acpi_bus_attach(struct acpi_ > if (ret < 0) > return; > > - if (ret > 0 || !device->pnp.type.platform_id) > - acpi_device_set_enumerated(device); > - else > + if (device->pnp.type.platform_id) > acpi_default_enumeration(device); > + else > + acpi_device_set_enumerated(device); > > ok: > list_for_each_entry(child, &device->children, node) > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
