On 11/04/17 15:42, linucherian@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Geetha <gakula@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Cavium 99xx SMMU implementation doesn't not support unique irq lines for
> gerror, eventq and cmdq-sync. USE_SHARED_IRQS option enables to use single
> irq line for all three interrupts.
AFAICS, there's nothing actually wrong with using shared wired IRQs -
the architecture spec doesn't appear to say anything about it. I think
it might suffice to simply add IRQF_SHARED if we can see the SMMU
doesn't support MSIs anyway - it doesn't really seem like something we
need to treat as a specific quirk.
> Signed-off-by: Geetha Sowjanya <gakula@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c | 18 +++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
> index b326195..1475ad8 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
> @@ -415,6 +415,9 @@
> #define ARM_SMMU_PAGE0_REGS_ONLY(s) \
> ((s)->options & ARM_SMMU_OPT_PAGE0_REGS_ONLY)
>
> +#define ARM_SMMU_USE_SHARED_IRQS(s) \
> + ((s)->options & ARM_SMMU_OPT_USE_SHARED_IRQS)
> +
> static bool disable_bypass;
> module_param_named(disable_bypass, disable_bypass, bool, S_IRUGO);
> MODULE_PARM_DESC(disable_bypass,
> @@ -601,6 +604,7 @@ struct arm_smmu_device {
>
> #define ARM_SMMU_OPT_SKIP_PREFETCH (1 << 0)
> #define ARM_SMMU_OPT_PAGE0_REGS_ONLY (1 << 1)
> +#define ARM_SMMU_OPT_USE_SHARED_IRQS (1 << 2)
> u32 options;
>
> struct arm_smmu_cmdq cmdq;
> @@ -668,6 +672,7 @@ struct arm_smmu_option_prop {
> static struct arm_smmu_option_prop arm_smmu_options[] = {
> { ARM_SMMU_OPT_SKIP_PREFETCH, "hisilicon,broken-prefetch-cmd" },
> { ARM_SMMU_OPT_PAGE0_REGS_ONLY, "cavium-cn99xx,broken-page1-regspace"},
> + { ARM_SMMU_OPT_USE_SHARED_IRQS, "cavium-cn99xx,broken-unique-irqlines"},
> { 0, NULL},
> };
>
> @@ -2237,6 +2242,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_setup_irqs(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
> {
> int ret, irq;
> u32 irqen_flags = IRQ_CTRL_EVTQ_IRQEN | IRQ_CTRL_GERROR_IRQEN;
> + u32 irqflags = IRQF_ONESHOT | IRQF_SHARED;
Either way, this is a really ugly way to go about it - I'd much rather
initialise the common base value:
u32 irqflags = (definitely not an MSI) ? IRQF_SHARED : 0;
>
> /* Disable IRQs first */
> ret = arm_smmu_write_reg_sync(smmu, 0, ARM_SMMU_IRQ_CTRL,
> @@ -2251,9 +2257,11 @@ static int arm_smmu_setup_irqs(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
> /* Request interrupt lines */
> irq = smmu->evtq.q.irq;
> if (irq) {
> + if (!ARM_SMMU_USE_SHARED_IRQS(smmu))
> + irqflags = IRQF_ONESHOT;
> ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(smmu->dev, irq, NULL,
> arm_smmu_evtq_thread,
> - IRQF_ONESHOT,
...and just pass irqflags | IRQF_ONESHOT here (and irqflags elsewhere),
without all the horrible copy-paste conditions.
Robin.
> + irqflags,
> "arm-smmu-v3-evtq", smmu);
> if (ret < 0)
> dev_warn(smmu->dev, "failed to enable evtq irq\n");
> @@ -2261,8 +2269,10 @@ static int arm_smmu_setup_irqs(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
>
> irq = smmu->cmdq.q.irq;
> if (irq) {
> + if (!ARM_SMMU_USE_SHARED_IRQS(smmu))
> + irqflags = 0;
> ret = devm_request_irq(smmu->dev, irq,
> - arm_smmu_cmdq_sync_handler, 0,
> + arm_smmu_cmdq_sync_handler, irqflags,
> "arm-smmu-v3-cmdq-sync", smmu);
> if (ret < 0)
> dev_warn(smmu->dev, "failed to enable cmdq-sync irq\n");
> @@ -2270,8 +2280,10 @@ static int arm_smmu_setup_irqs(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
>
> irq = smmu->gerr_irq;
> if (irq) {
> + if (!ARM_SMMU_USE_SHARED_IRQS(smmu))
> + irqflags = 0;
> ret = devm_request_irq(smmu->dev, irq, arm_smmu_gerror_handler,
> - 0, "arm-smmu-v3-gerror", smmu);
> + irqflags, "arm-smmu-v3-gerror", smmu);
> if (ret < 0)
> dev_warn(smmu->dev, "failed to enable gerror irq\n");
> }
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
