Just saw Baoquan He sent the same patch several days before, so Baoquan
take the precedence:)
On 04/11/2017 11:02 AM, Cao jin wrote:
> Re-CC RJW because wrong typing of the address
>
> On 04/11/2017 10:57 AM, Cao jin wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Cao jin <caoj.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/acpi/tables.c | 15 ---------------
>> include/linux/acpi.h | 4 ----
>> 2 files changed, 19 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/tables.c b/drivers/acpi/tables.c
>> index 2604189..7885339 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/tables.c
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/tables.c
>> @@ -310,21 +310,6 @@ acpi_parse_entries_array(char *id, unsigned long table_size,
>> return errs ? -EINVAL : count;
>> }
>>
>> -int __init
>> -acpi_parse_entries(char *id,
>> - unsigned long table_size,
>> - acpi_tbl_entry_handler handler,
>> - struct acpi_table_header *table_header,
>> - int entry_id, unsigned int max_entries)
>> -{
>> - struct acpi_subtable_proc proc = {
>> - .id = entry_id,
>> - .handler = handler,
>> - };
>> -
>> - return acpi_parse_entries_array(id, table_size, table_header,
>> - &proc, 1, max_entries);
>> -}
>>
>> int __init
>> acpi_table_parse_entries_array(char *id,
>> diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h
>> index 9b05886..83abbfc 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/acpi.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
>> @@ -233,10 +233,6 @@ int acpi_numa_init (void);
>>
>> int acpi_table_init (void);
>> int acpi_table_parse(char *id, acpi_tbl_table_handler handler);
>> -int __init acpi_parse_entries(char *id, unsigned long table_size,
>> - acpi_tbl_entry_handler handler,
>> - struct acpi_table_header *table_header,
>> - int entry_id, unsigned int max_entries);
>> int __init acpi_table_parse_entries(char *id, unsigned long table_size,
>> int entry_id,
>> acpi_tbl_entry_handler handler,
>>
>
--
Sincerely,
Cao jin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
