On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 11:37:12PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thursday, February 23, 2017 07:00:56 PM Sakari Ailus wrote: > > Hi, > > > > This set moves firmware specific implementations of the device / fwnode > > property API to locations that are specific to firmware implementation, > > still leaving property set (which isn't really firmware) implementation in > > drivers/base/property.c. > > > > The set begins with a few bugfixes (patches 1--3), followed by adding > > fwnode_operations struct and then gradually moving firmware dependent code > > to drivers/acpi/property.c and drivers/of/base.c. > > > > The set depends on the ACPI graph support here: > > > > <URL:http://marc.info/?l=linux-acpi&m=148786716920942&w=2> > > > > Comments are welcome. > > Patches [1-3/20] from this series seem to be fixes that don't depend on the > rest of it and don't depend on the other series you posted. > > If that is the case, it would be good to get them in during this cycle instead > of sitting on them for several weeks. > > So is that the case? Correct. There are no dependencies from patches 1--3 to the rest (first set or this one). -- Regards, Sakari Ailus e-mail: sakari.ailus@xxxxxx XMPP: sailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
