Re: [PATCH 00/35] treewide trivial patches converting pr_warning to pr_warn

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2017-02-23 at 09:28 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 1:11 AM, Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > There are ~4300 uses of pr_warn and ~250 uses of the older
> > pr_warning in the kernel source tree.
> > 
> > Make the use of pr_warn consistent across all kernel files.
> > 
> > This excludes all files in tools/ as there is a separate
> > define pr_warning for that directory tree and pr_warn is
> > not used in tools/.
> > 
> > Done with 'sed s/\bpr_warning\b/pr_warn/' and some emacsing.
[]
> Where's the removal of pr_warning so we don't have more sneak in?

After all of these actually get applied,
and maybe a cycle or two later, one would
get sent.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux