Re: [PATCH v2 15/16] device property: Add fwnode_get_next_parent()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Rafael,

On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 01:19:57PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
...
> > > I think I agree with Rob's prior comments about making an ops struct for DT
> > > vs ACPI.  Out of the 16 patches, 2/16, 3/16, 5/16 (multiple times), and this
> > > patch all end up using the same construct.  Maybe it needs to be a separate
> > > refactoring effort, but if it's happening this often just in this patch set,
> > > it seems like it's getting time to clean things up.
> > 
> > As long as there are two cases only (ACPI vs DT), an ops struct wouldn't
> > really make things simpler and it would make the code more difficult to
> > follow.
> > 
> > But we do have a third case (static or built-in properties) and it doesn't
> > seem to be covered at all.
> 
> That said the ops struct could be introduced on top of this series just fine.
> It even might be cleaner to do it this way, so I'm not asking for a redesign
> here.
> 
> I'd like the built-in properties to be covered too, however.

That sounds good to me. 

-- 
Kind regards,

Sakari Ailus
e-mail: sakari.ailus@xxxxxx	XMPP: sailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux