Re: [PATCH V8 05/10] acpi: apei: handle SEA notification type for ARMv8

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello James,


On 2/3/2017 9:00 AM, James Morse wrote:
On 01/02/17 17:16, Tyler Baicar wrote:
ARM APEI extension proposal added SEA (Synchronous External Abort)
notification type for ARMv8.
Add a new GHES error source handling function for SEA. If an error
source's notification type is SEA, then this function can be registered
into the SEA exception handler. That way GHES will parse and report
SEA exceptions when they occur.
It's worth adding details of the other things this patch changes, just to alert
busy reviewers, something like:
An SEA can interrupt code that had interrupts masked and is treated as an NMI.
To aid this the page of address space for mapping APEI buffers while in_nmi() is
always reserved, and ghes_ioremap_pfn_nmi() is changed to use the helper methods
to find the prot_t to map with in the same way as ghes_ioremap_pfn_irq().
I'll add this in in the next version.
diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
index 1117421..f92778d 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
@@ -53,6 +53,8 @@ config ARM64
  	select HANDLE_DOMAIN_IRQ
  	select HARDIRQS_SW_RESEND
  	select HAVE_ACPI_APEI if (ACPI && EFI)
+	select HAVE_ACPI_APEI_SEA if (ACPI && EFI)
+	select HAVE_NMI if HAVE_ACPI_APEI_SEA
Nit: This section of the file is largely in alphabetical order, can we try to
keep it that way?!
Yes, will do!
  	select HAVE_ALIGNED_STRUCT_PAGE if SLUB
  	select HAVE_ARCH_AUDITSYSCALL
  	select HAVE_ARCH_BITREVERSE
diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
index 9ae7e65..5a5a096 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
  #include <linux/highmem.h>
  #include <linux/perf_event.h>
  #include <linux/preempt.h>
+#include <linux/hardirq.h>
This header is already included by this file further up.
Oops, guess I missed that :)
#include <asm/bug.h>
  #include <asm/cpufeature.h>
@@ -41,6 +42,8 @@
  #include <asm/pgtable.h>
  #include <asm/tlbflush.h>
+#include <acpi/ghes.h>
+
  static const char *fault_name(unsigned int esr);
#ifdef CONFIG_KPROBES
@@ -500,6 +503,14 @@ static int do_sea(unsigned long addr, unsigned int esr, struct pt_regs *regs)
  	pr_err("Synchronous External Abort: %s (0x%08x) at 0x%016lx\n",
  		 fault_name(esr), esr, addr);
+ /*
+	 * synchronize_rcu() will wait for nmi_exit(), so no need to
+	 * rcu_read_lock().
+	 */
This comment should go against the use of RCU in ghes_notify_sea(), but there
should be something here to explain the surprise use of nmi. Something like:
Synchronous aborts may interrupt code which had interrupts masked. Before
calling out into the wider kernel tell the interested subsystems.
Sounds good. I'll update the comments.
This should be wrapped in:
if (IS_ENABLED(HAVE_ACPI_APEI_SEA)) {

+	nmi_enter();
+	ghes_notify_sea();
+	nmi_exit();
}

To avoid breaking systems that don't have SEA configured.
Yes, I'll add that check in the next version.
+
  	info.si_signo = SIGBUS;
  	info.si_errno = 0;
  	info.si_code  = 0;
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/Kconfig b/drivers/acpi/apei/Kconfig
index b0140c8..3786ff1 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/apei/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/Kconfig
@@ -4,6 +4,20 @@ config HAVE_ACPI_APEI
  config HAVE_ACPI_APEI_NMI
  	bool
+config HAVE_ACPI_APEI_SEA
+	bool "APEI Synchronous External Abort logging/recovering support"
+	depends on ARM64
depends on CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_GHES
?

(I think this is what the kbuild robot has managed to miss out!)
Will do.
+	help
+	  This option should be enabled if the system supports
+	  firmware first handling of SEA (Synchronous External Abort).
+	  SEA happens with certain faults of data abort or instruction
+	  abort synchronous exceptions on ARMv8 systems. If a system
+	  supports firmware first handling of SEA, the platform analyzes
+	  and handles hardware error notifications with SEA, and it may then
Nit: notifications from SEA,
Will do.
+	  form a HW error record for the OS to parse and handle. This
+	  option allows the OS to look for such HW error record, and
Nit: 'HW'->hardware. This is spelled out for the other seven uses in the file.
Will do.
+	  take appropriate action.
+
  config ACPI_APEI
  	bool "ACPI Platform Error Interface (APEI)"
  	select MISC_FILESYSTEMS
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
index b25e7cf..8756172 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
@@ -114,11 +114,7 @@
   * Two virtual pages are used, one for IRQ/PROCESS context, the other for
   * NMI context (optionally).
   */
-#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ACPI_APEI_NMI
  #define GHES_IOREMAP_PAGES           2
-#else
-#define GHES_IOREMAP_PAGES           1
-#endif
  #define GHES_IOREMAP_IRQ_PAGE(base)	(base)
  #define GHES_IOREMAP_NMI_PAGE(base)	((base) + PAGE_SIZE)
@@ -156,11 +152,14 @@ static void ghes_ioremap_exit(void) static void __iomem *ghes_ioremap_pfn_nmi(u64 pfn)
  {
-	unsigned long vaddr;
+	unsigned long vaddr, paddr;
+	pgprot_t prot;
vaddr = (unsigned long)GHES_IOREMAP_NMI_PAGE(ghes_ioremap_area->addr);
-	ioremap_page_range(vaddr, vaddr + PAGE_SIZE,
-			   pfn << PAGE_SHIFT, PAGE_KERNEL);
+
+	paddr = pfn << PAGE_SHIFT;
Physical addresses might not always fit in 'unsigned long'. phys_addr_t exists
to hide this nasty detail!

 From arch/x86/Kconfig:
config ARCH_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT
	def_bool y
	depends on X86_64 || X86_PAE
32bit x86 kernels configured with PAE define phys_addr_t to be u64.
I'll make that change.

ghes_ioremap_pfn_irq() should probably be updated in a separate change because it uses unsigned
long for it's paddr...I just mimicked that code here :)
+	prot = arch_apei_get_mem_attribute(paddr);
+	ioremap_page_range(vaddr, vaddr + PAGE_SIZE, paddr, prot);
return (void __iomem *)vaddr;
  }
@@ -767,6 +766,48 @@ static int ghes_notify_sci(struct notifier_block *this,
  	.notifier_call = ghes_notify_sci,
  };
+#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ACPI_APEI_SEA
+static LIST_HEAD(ghes_sea);
+
+void ghes_notify_sea(void)
+{
+	struct ghes *ghes;
+
	/*
	 * synchronize_rcu() will wait for nmi_exit(), so no need to
	 * rcu_read_lock().
	 */

+	list_for_each_entry_rcu(ghes, &ghes_sea, list) {
+		ghes_proc(ghes);
+	}
+}
+
+static int ghes_sea_add(struct ghes *ghes)
+{
+	mutex_lock(&ghes_list_mutex);
+	list_add_rcu(&ghes->list, &ghes_sea);
+	mutex_unlock(&ghes_list_mutex);
+	return 0;
This function returns 0 or -ENOTSUPP, depending on CONFIG_HAVE_ACPI_APEI_SEA,
but ...


+}
+
+static void ghes_sea_remove(struct ghes *ghes)
+{
+	mutex_lock(&ghes_list_mutex);
+	list_del_rcu(&ghes->list);
+	mutex_unlock(&ghes_list_mutex);
+	synchronize_rcu();
+}
+#else /* CONFIG_HAVE_ACPI_APEI_SEA */
+static inline int ghes_sea_add(struct ghes *ghes)
+{
+	pr_err(GHES_PFX "ID: %d, trying to add SEA notification which is not supported\n",
+	       ghes->generic->header.source_id);
+	return -ENOTSUPP;
+}
+
+static inline void ghes_sea_remove(struct ghes *ghes)
+{
+	pr_err(GHES_PFX "ID: %d, trying to remove SEA notification which is not supported\n",
+	       ghes->generic->header.source_id);
+}
+#endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_ACPI_APEI_SEA */
+
  #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ACPI_APEI_NMI
  /*
   * printk is not safe in NMI context.  So in NMI handler, we allocate
@@ -1012,6 +1053,14 @@ static int ghes_probe(struct platform_device *ghes_dev)
  	case ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_EXTERNAL:
  	case ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_SCI:
  		break;
+	case ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_SEA:
+		if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAVE_ACPI_APEI_SEA)) {
+			pr_warn(GHES_PFX "Generic hardware error source: %d notified via SEA is not supported\n",
+				generic->header.source_id);
+			rc = -ENOTSUPP;
+			goto err;
... here we jump out of ghes_probe() if NOTIFY_SEA is used but the kernel wasn't
built with CONFIG_HAVE_ACPI_APEI_SEA....


+		}
+		break;
  	case ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_NMI:
  		if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAVE_ACPI_APEI_NMI)) {
  			pr_warn(GHES_PFX "Generic hardware error source: %d notified via NMI interrupt is not supported!\n",
@@ -1023,6 +1072,13 @@ static int ghes_probe(struct platform_device *ghes_dev)
  		pr_warning(GHES_PFX "Generic hardware error source: %d notified via local interrupt is not supported!\n",
  			   generic->header.source_id);
  		goto err;
+	case ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_GPIO:
+	case ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_SEI:
+	case ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_GSIV:
+		pr_warn(GHES_PFX "Generic hardware error source: %d notified via notification type %u is not supported\n",
+			generic->header.source_id, generic->header.source_id);
+		rc = -ENOTSUPP;
+		goto err;
  	default:
  		pr_warning(FW_WARN GHES_PFX "Unknown notification type: %u for generic hardware error source: %d\n",
  			   generic->notify.type, generic->header.source_id);
@@ -1077,6 +1133,11 @@ static int ghes_probe(struct platform_device *ghes_dev)
  		list_add_rcu(&ghes->list, &ghes_sci);
  		mutex_unlock(&ghes_list_mutex);
  		break;
+	case ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_SEA:
+		rc = ghes_sea_add(ghes);
... so this error handling will never be needed.
ghes_nmi_add() returns void.

I guess the not-configured versions of the symbols need to exist for older
compilers that can't work out that this can never be called.
I can remove the extra error handling here.
+		if (rc)
+			goto err_edac_unreg;
+		break;
  	case ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_NMI:
  		ghes_nmi_add(ghes);
  		break;
@@ -1119,6 +1180,9 @@ static int ghes_remove(struct platform_device *ghes_dev)
  			unregister_acpi_hed_notifier(&ghes_notifier_sci);
  		mutex_unlock(&ghes_list_mutex);
  		break;
+	case ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_SEA:
+		ghes_sea_remove(ghes);
+		break;
  	case ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_NMI:
  		ghes_nmi_remove(ghes);
  		break;
diff --git a/include/acpi/ghes.h b/include/acpi/ghes.h
index 6ae318b..adf5455 100644
--- a/include/acpi/ghes.h
+++ b/include/acpi/ghes.h
@@ -95,3 +95,5 @@ static inline void *acpi_hest_generic_data_payload(struct acpi_hest_generic_data
  		(void *)(((struct acpi_hest_generic_data_v300 *)(gdata)) + 1) :
  		gdata + 1;
  }
+
+void ghes_notify_sea(void);

This header file ought to have an include guard, could you add one?

I think the kbuild-robot has managed to configure SEA on, but GHES off so ghes.c
isn't included in the kernel. I will dig some more into this on Monday.
Yes, I can add that.

Thanks for all the great reviewing :)

Tyler

--
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux