On 2/3/2017 10:11 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote: > On 03/02/17 14:50, Sinan Kaya wrote: >> On 1/18/2017 7:54 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote: >>> From: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> With platform msi support landed in the kernel, and the introduction >>> of IORT for GICv3 ITS (PCI MSI) and SMMU, the framework for platform msi >>> is ready, this patch set add few patches to enable the ACPI platform >>> msi support. >>> >>> For platform device connecting to ITS on arm platform, we have IORT >>> table with the named componant node to describe the mappings of paltform >>> device and ITS, so we can retrieve the dev id and find its parent >>> irqdomain (ITS) from IORT table (simlar with the ACPI ITS support). >>> >> >> I understand that there is a consensus on IORT/SMMUv3 specific pieces >> of this series while there is some ongoing work on the MBIgen part in >> due to dependency on Agustin's patch vs. ACPI definitions. >> >> Can we merge the IORT/SMMUv3 specific pieces to 4.11 so that the base >> implementation comes in place? > > Sorry, but I may be missing something. Which IORT/SMMUv3 patches are we > talking about? Do you have a pointer to a series? > I was talking about patches V8 00-12 of this particular one. [PATCH v8 00/15] ACPI platform MSI support and its example mbigen Patches 13-15 are specific for MBIGEN. 00-12 are for the base functionality. > Thanks, > > M. > -- Sinan Kaya Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
