Re: Cherryview wake up events

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Mika,

On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 03:37:40PM +0100, Johannes Stezenbach wrote:
> - Powerbutton driver seems simple enough, the only specialty
>   of the TI dcove PB driver is the workarond for lost button
>   press event after resume.  However, I still don't see how
>   the PB would cause thermal event irqs on E200HA and how the
>   PMIC driver would change it?

In ProductionKernelQuilts I found
DC-TI-PMIC-disable-power-button-support.patch so I guess it
might not be needed because it's probably handled by ACPI.

> I think the mfd driver would be similar to intel_soc_pmic_crc.c,
> the dollar_cove_ti_powerbtn.c I would keep instead of merging
> it into intel_mid_powerbtn.c.  I guess what we need is in
> drivers/acpi/pmic/ something similar to intel_pmic_crc.c,
> the ProductionKernelQuilts has 0001-ACPI-Adding-support-for-TI-pmic-opregion.patch.

I have preliminary versions of the mfd and opregion driver,
while testing I found the GPIO opregion is not registered:

Excerpt from DSDT:
https://linuxtv.org/~js/e200ha/dsdt.dsl

            Device (PMI2)
            {
                Name (_ADR, Zero)  // _ADR: Address
                Name (_HID, "INT33F5" /* TI PMIC Controller */)  // _HID: Hardware ID
                Name (_CID, "INT33F5" /* TI PMIC Controller */)  // _CID: Compatible ID
                Name (_DDN, "TI PMIC Controller")  // _DDN: DOS Device Name
                Name (_HRV, 0x03)  // _HRV: Hardware Revision
                Name (_UID, One)  // _UID: Unique ID
                Name (_DEP, Package (0x02)  // _DEP: Dependencies
                {
                    I2C7, 
                    GPO1
                })
                Method (_CRS, 0, NotSerialized)  // _CRS: Current Resource Settings
                {
                    Name (SBUF, ResourceTemplate ()
                    {
                        I2cSerialBusV2 (0x005E, ControllerInitiated, 0x000F4240,
                            AddressingMode7Bit, "\\_SB.PCI0.I2C7",
                            0x00, ResourceConsumer, , Exclusive,
                            )
                        GpioInt (Level, ActiveHigh, Shared, PullDefault, 0x0000,
                            "\\_SB.GPO1", 0x00, ResourceConsumer, ,
                            )
                            {   // Pin list
                                0x000F
                            }
                    })
                    Return (SBUF) /* \_SB_.PCI0.I2C7.PMI2._CRS.SBUF */
                }
...
                Name (AVBL, Zero)
                Name (AVBD, Zero)
                Name (AVBG, Zero)
                Method (_REG, 2, NotSerialized)  // _REG: Region Availability
                {
                    If (Arg0 == 0x08)
                    {
                        AVBG = Arg1
                    }

                    If (Arg0 == 0x8D)
                    {
                        AVBL = Arg1
                    }

                    If (Arg0 == 0x8C)
                    {
                        AVBD = Arg1
                    }
                }


acpidbg:
        \_SB.PCI0.I2C7.PMI2.AVBL Integer      ffff8be7b74d97a8 01 = 0000000000000001
        \_SB.PCI0.I2C7.PMI2.AVBD Integer      ffff8be7b74d94d8 01 = 0000000000000001
        \_SB.PCI0.I2C7.PMI2.AVBG Integer      ffff8be7b74d9be0 01 = 0000000000000000

Any idea about it?
devm_gpiochip_add_data() in chv_gpio_probe() indirectly calls acpi_gpiochip_add()
which should use _DEP to figure out to call _REG, right?

Also PMI2 has

                OperationRegion (GPOP, GeneralPurposeIo, Zero, 0x0100)
                Field (GPOP, ByteAcc, NoLock, Preserve)
                {
                    Connection (
                        GpioIo (Exclusive, PullDefault, 0x0000, 0x0000, IoRestrictionOutputOnly,
                            "\\_SB.PCI0.I2C7.PMI2", 0x00, ResourceConsumer, ,
                            )
                            {   // Pin list
                                0x0020
                            }
                    ), 
                    GMP0,   1, 
                    ...
                    (repeat for many more pins)

I guess it means it uses chv_gpio pins and can't work
if the GPIO opregion is not registered?


FWIW, with the mfd driver, /proc/interrupts has

 180:          0          0          0          0  chv-gpio    9  TI Dollar Cove

I guess the 9 refers to the 10th pin in north_pins[] which is pin 0x000F, right?
I boot with "dyndbg=file gpiolib* +p" and get

[  +0.012798] acpi INT33F5:00: GPIO: looking up 0 in _CRS
[  +0.000214] intel_soc_pmic_i2c i2c-INT33F5:00: GPIO lookup for consumer intel_soc_pmic
[  +0.000003] intel_soc_pmic_i2c i2c-INT33F5:00: using ACPI for GPIO lookup
[  +0.000005] acpi INT33F5:00: GPIO: looking up intel_soc_pmic-gpios
[  +0.000005] acpi INT33F5:00: GPIO: looking up intel_soc_pmic-gpio
[  +0.000005] acpi INT33F5:00: GPIO: looking up 0 in _CRS
[  +0.000091] cherryview-pinctrl INT33FF:01: request pin 15 (GPIO_SUS0) for INT33FF:01:406

but so far the irq never triggers.


Thanks
Johannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux