On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 9:56 PM, Michał Kępień <kernel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 5:11 AM, Michał Kępień <kernel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >> My laptop has one RW data object, one RO data object, and one
>> >> totally inaccessible data object. Check for the existence of the
>> >> accessor methods and report in sysfs.
>> >>
>> >> The docs also permit WQxx getters for single-instance objects to
>> >> take no parameters. Probe for that as well to avoid ACPICA warnings
>> >> about mismatched signatures.
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> ---
>> >> drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c | 94 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>> >> include/linux/wmi.h | 6 +++
>> >> 2 files changed, 96 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>> >>
>> >> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c
>> >> index 5571ae7354a1..49be61207c4a 100644
>> >> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c
>> >> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/wmi.c
>> >> @@ -66,6 +66,8 @@ struct wmi_block {
>> >> struct acpi_device *acpi_device;
>> >> wmi_notify_handler handler;
>> >> void *handler_data;
>> >> +
>> >> + bool read_takes_no_args; /* only defined if readable */
>> >> };
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> @@ -216,6 +218,25 @@ static bool find_guid(const char *guid_string, struct wmi_block **out)
>> >> return false;
>> >> }
>> >>
>> >> +static int get_subobj_info(acpi_handle handle, const char *pathname,
>> >> + struct acpi_device_info *info)
>> >> +{
>> >> + acpi_handle subobj_handle;
>> >> + acpi_status status;
>> >> +
>> >> + status = acpi_get_handle(handle, (char *)pathname, &subobj_handle);
>> >> + if (status == AE_NOT_FOUND)
>> >> + return -ENOENT;
>> >> + else if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
>> >> + return -EIO;
>> >> +
>> >> + status = acpi_get_object_info(subobj_handle, &info);
>> >
>> > acpi_get_object_info() allocates the returned buffer itself. The latter
>> > should then subsequently be freed by the caller. One solution is to
>> > change get_subobj_info() so that it takes a struct acpi_device_info **
>> > as an argument, which should then be passed to acpi_get_object_info().
>> > See also below.
>>
>> I have an updated version of this patch in my queue. I'll try to send
>> it early next week.
>
> Hi Andy,
>
> Are you planning any further work on this patch series (originally
> posted in December 2015)? It seems to be a valuable cleanup.
I have a tree in which the patches are sitting and I've kept them
rebased, but I haven't had a chance to go through all the review
comments and send them out. Want to do it?
--Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
