On 12/21/2016 05:07 PM, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote: > On 12/21/16 5:05 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: >> >> Ok, by clkdev design if a device is passed but there isn't a >> match in the lookup table it allows it to match based solely on >> the connection id. Given that the connection id is globally >> unique this will work. >> >> Hopefully we don't have two of these devices with pmc_plt_clk_<n> >> signals in a single system though. Then having the device name >> would help differentiate between the two. And then it may make >> sense to have some sort of ACPI lookup system, similar to how we >> have lookups for clks in DT. > > So in short we keep the existing solution for now and will only use > the device name if and when the pmc_plt_clk_<n> identifier is no > longer unique due to hardware changes. Did I get this right? Ok. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
