Hi Boris,
On 12/16/2016 11:35 AM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> If acpi_cppc_processor_probe() had not executed successfully (for
> example, if _CPC object was not found) then cpc_desc_ptr for that
> processor will be invalid.
>
> Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
> index d0d0504..5bba26e 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
> @@ -824,6 +824,8 @@ void acpi_cppc_processor_exit(struct acpi_processor *pr)
> void __iomem *addr;
>
> cpc_ptr = per_cpu(cpc_desc_ptr, pr->id);
> + if (!cpc_ptr)
> + return;
>
> /* Free all the mapped sys mem areas for this CPU */
> for (i = 2; i < cpc_ptr->num_entries; i++) {
I think a recent patch from Sebastian fixed the same issue.
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git/commit/?h=bleeding-edge&id=9e9d68dad58c70f40f50adfeabd2fdaa39a743fd
--
Thanks,
Prashanth
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
