On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 05:05:49PM +0100, Joerg Roedel wrote: > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 09:56:15AM +0000, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > > I can easily make the changes Robin suggests above, I need to know > > what to do with this patch it is the last blocking point for this > > series and time is running out I can revert to using dev->bus to > > retrieve iommu_ops (even though I do not think it makes sense given > > what Robin outlines below) but I need to know please, we can't gate > > an entire series for this patch that is just syntactic sugar. > > Well, I didn't really object to the approach per-se, I just wanted to > know the rationale behind the need for the iommu-ops pointer. So through > which tree should this series be merged? I was just about to send a pull request to you, since it conflicts with my ARM SMMU patches and the PCI/ACPI bits are acked by Rafael and Bjorn. My for-joerg/arm-smmu/updates is ready to go; just need to write the pull request. Will -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
