On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 01:09:30PM +0200, Peter Wu wrote: > On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 11:56:30AM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 06:06:48PM +0200, Peter Wu wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 12:55:08PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote: > > > > On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 09:42:28AM +0000, Rick Kerkhof wrote: > > > > > No, there are not. Here is the recursive directory listing: > > > > > > > > Are you able to try the following patch and send me dmesg (or attach it > > > > to that bug)? It should show if the ACPI core even tries to add those > > > > power resources. > > > > > > So Rick has tested this patch now on top of 4.8.4 (mainline fails to > > > boot due to a kbuild issue which I reported elsewhere), but the output > > > is empty. That seems to indicate that flags.power_resources is unset. > > > > Is it completely empty or is it empty just for RP05? It should print out > > all devices with power resources. > > \NVP2 and \NVP3 are the only power resources under RP05 and defined in > SSDT1, there are no others. We should probably add a debug print before checking flags.power_resources just to be sure the patch is correctly applied. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
