On Wed, 2016-10-26 at 12:27 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Thu, 20 Oct 2016, Tim Chen wrote: > > > > > We generalize the scheduler's asym packing to provide an ordering > > of the cpu beyond just the cpu number. This allows the use of the > > ASYM_PACKING scheduler machinery to move loads to preferred CPU in a > > sched domain. The preference is defined with the cpu priority > > given by arch_asym_cpu_priority(cpu). > > > > We also record the most preferred cpu in a sched group when > > we build the cpu's capacity for fast lookup of preferred cpu > > during load balancing. > > > > Signed-off-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > This SOB-chain is bogus. Same for all other patches. > I am the primary author of the patch so I have my sign-off on top. There were also much internal discussions/reviews between myself, Peter and Srinivas, before we post the first version of this patch. I incorporated their inputs into the patch and added their sign-offs. Can you be more explicit on why you think the sign-offs here are bogus? Thanks. Tim -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
