Re: [PATCH v6 5/9] x86/sysctl: Add sysctl for ITMT scheduling feature

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 12:49:36PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:

> > +	/*
> > +	 * ITMT capability automatically enables ITMT
> > +	 * scheduling for small systems (single node).
> > +	 */
> > +	if (topology_num_packages() == 1)
> > +		sysctl_sched_itmt_enabled = 1;
> 
> I really hate this. This is policy and the kernel should not impose
> policy. Why would I like to have this enforced on my single socket XEON
> server?

So this really wants to be enabled by default; otherwise nobody will use
this, and it really does help single threaded workloads.

There were reservations on the multi-socket case of ITMT, maybe it would
help to spell those out in great detail here. That is, have the comment
explain the policy instead of simply stating what the code does (which
is always bad comment policy, you can read the code just fine).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux IBM ACPI]     [Linux Power Management]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Laptop]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux