On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:28:29PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Boris, all fine here?
Short answer: Yeah, looks ok to me.
Longer answer: I mean, this way ghes_proc() *actually* propagates the
return value of ghes_read_estatus() and we don't do any processing if it
failed.
Which doesn't really tell me a whole lot about the actual processing,
i.e., what ghes_do_proc() did.
But ghes_do_proc() doesn't return anything and ghes_proc()'s retval is
used only in contexts where we're asking whether something got processed
or not.
And for that, that fix is adequate. So:
Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxx>
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
