Just a few nits: Agustin Vega-Frias wrote:
+int acpi_irq_domain_register_irq(struct acpi_resource_source *source, u32 hwirq, + int trigger, int polarity) +{ + struct irq_fwspec fwspec; + struct acpi_device *device; + acpi_handle handle; + acpi_status status; + int ret; + + if (source->string_length == 0)
Would (!source->string_length) be more meaningful?
+ return acpi_register_gsi(NULL, hwirq, trigger, polarity); + + status = acpi_get_handle(NULL, source->string_ptr, &handle); + if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) + return -ENODEV; + + device = acpi_bus_get_acpi_device(handle); + if (!device) + return -ENODEV; + + if (acpi_irq_domain_ensure_probed(device)) + return -ENODEV; + + fwspec.fwnode = &device->fwnode; + fwspec.param[0] = hwirq; + fwspec.param[1] = acpi_dev_get_irq_type(trigger, polarity); + fwspec.param_count = 2; + + ret = irq_create_fwspec_mapping(&fwspec); + acpi_bus_put_acpi_device(device); + return ret;
Blank line before 'return'.
-static void acpi_dev_get_irqresource(struct resource *res, u32 gsi, +static void acpi_dev_get_irqresource(struct resource *res, u32 hwirq, + struct acpi_resource_source *source,
This should probably be a 'const', because ...
@@ -448,6 +449,7 @@ bool acpi_dev_resource_interrupt(struct acpi_resource *ares, int index, { struct acpi_resource_irq *irq; struct acpi_resource_extended_irq *ext_irq; + struct acpi_resource_source dummy = { 0, 0, NULL };
... then you can make this a static const, which will reduce code size and improve performance.
@@ -1024,6 +1030,43 @@ struct acpi_probe_entry { (&ACPI_PROBE_TABLE_END(t) - \ &ACPI_PROBE_TABLE(t))); \ }) + +#define ACPI_HID_LEN 9
Please add a comment for this. -- Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html