On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 02:44:29PM +0200, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 01:44:46AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 11:37 PM, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > My primary concern is the addition of what appear to be phandles > introduced as part of this patch set. The previous discussion had been > that we'd enable simple DT bindings which don't need inter-device > references and that those needed more careful study. This appears to > be changing that. Agreed. To be quite clear, it doesn't matter that the mechanism isn't phandles per-se. The fact that we're trying to describe relationships between devices (which has fuzzy overlap with other parts of ACPI) is the major concern. Thanks, Mark. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
